Online Coin-Op Game
Play Online Computer Game
Online Kids And Teens: Gam
College and University
Art Voices
Online Board Games
Online Art History
Online Music
Online Writing
Television
News and Media
Yard, Deck, and Table Games
Hand-Eye Coordination
Paper and Pencil
Online Developers and Publi
Online Women in Gaming
Online Computer Science
Online Fonts
Online Human-Computer Inter
Online Speech Technology
Online Data Communications
Food and Related Products
Graphic Design
Online Libraries
Online Weblogs
Online Directories
Online Book Shopping
Chats and Forums
Web Rings
Birds And Blooms
Social Sciences
Methods and Techniques
Research Groups and CentersOnline Bibliography
Open Access Resources
Knowledge Management
Ask an Expert
Online Questions and Answe
Trains and Railroads
Newspapers
Internet Broadcasts
Museums and Archives
Colleges and Universities
Online Headline Links
People and Society
School Time
Teen Life
Health Care
Your Family
Sports and Hobbies
Apartment Living
Do-It-Yourself
Online Home Business
Personal Organization
Online Rural Living
Online Domestic Services
Online Personal Finance
Online Healthcare Industry
Online Support Groups
Environmental Health
printed project
Spread Artculture
Watercolor Artist
Famous Magazine
Focus: Fine Art Photography
Nature's Best Photography
Team Handball
Autographs
Basketball
Video Games: Sports
Water Sports
Lifestyle Choices
Language and Linguistics
Consumer Goods and Services
Antiques and Collectibles
Beauty Products
Office Products
Online Shopping
Home and Garden
Earth Sciences
Online Software
Online Employment
Birds And Blooms
Dogs Today
Feline Wellness
Modern Dog
Traditional House Plans
Print Design Annual
India Art Collector
Design Issues
Gallery Guide
Google Home
Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual
Online Play-By-Mail
Online Gambling
Online Web Hosting
Play Online Video Games
Global Exec Women
Women's Health
Science and Nature
Online Jewelry
This Old House
Modern Painters
sandiya
Friday, September 11, 2009
Monday, August 3, 2009
From the New York Times
From the New York Times, the inside scoop on the end of the Keith Olbermann/Bill O'Reilly war:
It was perhaps the fiercest media feud of the decade and by this year, their bosses had had enough. But it took a fellow television personality with a neutral perspective to help bring it to at least a temporary end.
At an off-the-record summit meeting for chief executives sponsored by Microsoft in mid-May, the PBS interviewer Charlie Rose asked Jeffrey Immelt, chairman of G.E., and his counterpart at the News Corporation, Rupert Murdoch, about the feud.
Both moguls expressed regret over the venomous culture between the networks and the increasingly personal nature of the barbs. Days later, even though the feud had increased the audience of both programs, their lieutenants arranged a cease-fire, according to four people who work at the companies and have direct knowledge of the deal.
In early June, the combat stopped, and MSNBC and Fox, for the most part, found other targets for their verbal missiles (Hello, CNN).
“It was time to grow up,” a senior employee of one of the companies said.
More here.
Yeah, I was starting to wonder how long the free hookers and beer would last.
For a while there, I've been able to say that ideologically analyzing the corporate media landscape has, as of late, become more problematic: you can make your arguments one way or the other, but MSNBC really has morphed into the formerly imaginary "liberal media" that the right wing has been railing about for many years now. That is, the "liberal media," being pro-government and pro-big business, and therefore conservative, have never existed, except in the paranoid minds of conservatives. Since MSNBC hired Olbermann, Maddow, and now Ed Schultz, it's not so absolute anymore.
But this General Electric imposed "truce" between O'Reilly and Olbermann is a stark reminder that all this liberal television fun exists only as long as NBC's parent company, deeply entrenched within the military/industrial/entertainment complex, believes MSNBC's antics are both profitable and unthreatening to the corporate establishment. That is, this left-leaning TV news anomoly could be gone faster than you can say "Donohue," if G.E. decides it has become troublesome.
I mean, that's really the ultimate problem with corporate ownership of news reporting organizations: if you're too critical of the corporate business model or its interests, you get the axe. Apparently, going after Fox darling O'Reilly came close to that. So, poof, no more attacks on the big butthole.
Oh well. There's always listener and viewer supported Democracy Now fighting the good fight. No corporate influence there, I guarantee it.
It was perhaps the fiercest media feud of the decade and by this year, their bosses had had enough. But it took a fellow television personality with a neutral perspective to help bring it to at least a temporary end.
At an off-the-record summit meeting for chief executives sponsored by Microsoft in mid-May, the PBS interviewer Charlie Rose asked Jeffrey Immelt, chairman of G.E., and his counterpart at the News Corporation, Rupert Murdoch, about the feud.
Both moguls expressed regret over the venomous culture between the networks and the increasingly personal nature of the barbs. Days later, even though the feud had increased the audience of both programs, their lieutenants arranged a cease-fire, according to four people who work at the companies and have direct knowledge of the deal.
In early June, the combat stopped, and MSNBC and Fox, for the most part, found other targets for their verbal missiles (Hello, CNN).
“It was time to grow up,” a senior employee of one of the companies said.
More here.
Yeah, I was starting to wonder how long the free hookers and beer would last.
For a while there, I've been able to say that ideologically analyzing the corporate media landscape has, as of late, become more problematic: you can make your arguments one way or the other, but MSNBC really has morphed into the formerly imaginary "liberal media" that the right wing has been railing about for many years now. That is, the "liberal media," being pro-government and pro-big business, and therefore conservative, have never existed, except in the paranoid minds of conservatives. Since MSNBC hired Olbermann, Maddow, and now Ed Schultz, it's not so absolute anymore.
But this General Electric imposed "truce" between O'Reilly and Olbermann is a stark reminder that all this liberal television fun exists only as long as NBC's parent company, deeply entrenched within the military/industrial/entertainment complex, believes MSNBC's antics are both profitable and unthreatening to the corporate establishment. That is, this left-leaning TV news anomoly could be gone faster than you can say "Donohue," if G.E. decides it has become troublesome.
I mean, that's really the ultimate problem with corporate ownership of news reporting organizations: if you're too critical of the corporate business model or its interests, you get the axe. Apparently, going after Fox darling O'Reilly came close to that. So, poof, no more attacks on the big butthole.
Oh well. There's always listener and viewer supported Democracy Now fighting the good fight. No corporate influence there, I guarantee it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)